Date of Completion
2016
Document Type
Honors College Thesis
Department
Political Science
Thesis Type
Honors College, College of Arts and Science Honors
First Advisor
Robert Pepperman Taylor
Abstract
This paper attempts to respond to Andrew Delbanco's 2011 essay "The Abolitionist Imagination" and its conclusions about the abolitionists. While Delbanco's concerns about the abolitionists' mindsets present valid concerns, he simplifies the nuances between the abolitionists' political philosophies and wrongly portrays Nathaniel Hawthorne as the political ideal. By applying Max Weber's political ethics to the citizen rather than the politician as a political actor, this response examines different abolitionist figures, such as William Lloyd Garrison, Henry David Thoreau, David Walker, Henry Highland Garnet, and Frederick Douglass, through a liberal lens similar to Delbanco's. This analysis also suggests that Douglass may present the most politically ideal approach to abolition rather than Hawthorne.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
Recommended Citation
Eaton, Ariel F., "The Abolitionist Archetype: Andrew Delbanco and the Ethics of Political Protest" (2016). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 101.
https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/101