Loading...
Use of the journal impact factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations
McKiernan, Erin C. Schimanski, Lesley A. Nieves, Carol Muñoz Matthias, Lisa Niles, Meredith T. Alperin, Juan P.
McKiernan, Erin C.
Schimanski, Lesley A.
Nieves, Carol Muñoz
Matthias, Lisa
Niles, Meredith T.
Alperin, Juan P.
Citations
Altmetric:
License
© McKiernan et al.
DOI
10.7554/eLife.47338
Abstract
We analyzed how often and in what ways the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is currently used in review, promotion, and tenure (RPT) documents of a representative sample of universities from the United States and Canada. 40% of research-intensive institutions and 18% of master’s institutions mentioned the JIF, or closely related terms. Of the institutions that mentioned the JIF, 87% supported its use in at least one of their RPT documents, 13% expressed caution about its use, and none heavily criticized it or prohibited its use. Furthermore, 63% of institutions that mentioned the JIF associated the metric with quality, 40% with impact, importance, or significance, and 20% with prestige, reputation, or status. We conclude that use of the JIF is encouraged in RPT evaluations, especially at research-intensive universities, and that there is work to be done to avoid the potential misuse of metrics like the JIF.
Description
Date
2019-07-01
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Files
Loading...
Niles2019e.pdf
Adobe PDF, 492.45 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Citation
McKiernan EC, Schimanski LA, Nieves CM, Matthias L, Niles MT, Alperin JP. Meta-research: use of the journal impact factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. Elife. 2019 Jul 31;8:e47338.