Loading...
Public Perceptions of Smoking in the Workplace
Barry, Jessica Kneppar, Jennifer Salib, Timothy Severy, Jonathan Shapiro, Bennett Skelly, Kathryn Tweadey, Kara Ryan, Rebecca Davis, Gerald
Barry, Jessica
Kneppar, Jennifer
Salib, Timothy
Severy, Jonathan
Shapiro, Bennett
Skelly, Kathryn
Tweadey, Kara
Ryan, Rebecca
Davis, Gerald
Citations
Altmetric:
License
DOI
Abstract
Introduction: Important public health policy decisions must be based on reliable epidemiologic studies and evidence-based medicine. In the effort to ban smoking in the workplace, there must be clear evidence from the constituency that such laws are desired. Current Vermont law states: "Employers may designate up to 30 percent of an employee cafeteria or lounge as a smoking area and may permit smoking in designated unenclosed areas only if … smoking will not be a physical irritant to any non-smoking employee, and 75 percent of the employees in the designated areas agree to allow smoking." State legislators must address this issue for several reasons: * Long term effects including lung cancer, emphysema, heart and neurologic disease. * Secondhand smoke contains at least 250 chemicals known to be toxic, including more than 50 that can cause cancer. * The total cost of secondhand smoke exposure in the U.S. at $10 billion annually, $5 billion in direct medical costs, and $5 billion in indirect costs such as lost productivity. * Methods to reduce the effect of secondhand smoke, such as ventilators are ineffective. * One study found a 17% increased risk of developing lung cancer with smoking exposure in the workplace. Regardless, Vermonters continue to smoke; as of 2007, 18% of Vermont’s adults were smokers. Such information is important in making legislative decisions that affect the entire Vermont population
Description
Date
2009-02-02