Date of Award

2006

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science (MS)

Department

Plant Biology

First Advisor

Donald A. Stratton, Ph.D.

Second Advisor

Catherine A. Paris, Ph.D.

Third Advisor

Charles J. Goodnight, Ph.D.

Abstract

To test the prediction that peripheral populations are genetically compromised relative to central populations, seeds were collected from three peripheral populations and ten central populations in Vermont, New York, and the Great Lakes region. Common garden studies were used to estimate broad sense heritabilities for quantitative traits, which were in turn used to relate genetic variation within a population to population size. Performance related to fitness was also compared to population size. Cross-pollinations were performed at various scales to observe the effects of inbreeding and outbreeding on Fl and F2 fitness. Contrary to theoretical predictions, I found that large populations are neither significantly more variable nor more fit than small populations. In addition, some populations are generally more variable than others, regardless of population size. Cumulative cross fitness did not vary according to cross type or among peripheral and central populations, suggesting that neither population type shows a preference for inbreeding or outbreeding. Recombination in Fl hybrids between Vermont mothers and New York fathers significantly decreased cross fitness, suggesting outbreeding depression, but because we do not have data on the parental generation, other phenomena such as Fl heterosis cannot be ruled out.

Language

English

Number of Pages

88

Share

COinS