Early Detection of True or False Cardiac Alarms in the ICU

Presenter's Name(s)

Jack BoyntonFollow

Conference Year

January 2021

Abstract

Early detection of whether a cardiac alarm is true or false is as critical as accurate detection in intensive care. Delayed detection may lead to a patient’s death if the alarm is true or to disruption if false. There has been a body of research, as signified by the 2015 PhysioNet/CinC Challenge, and due accomplishments have been made in the relevant computational technology. The focus of the research, however, has been on the accuracy of false-alarm detection, and yet the highest accuracy known thus far is in the lower 80% range. Our work achieves much higher accuracy by utilizing state-of-the-art machine learning methods and, more importantly, achieves very early detection, almost at the onset of a cardiac alarm. This is enabled by the machine learning method used, which is a combination of ResNet and BiLSTM. Using the PhysioNet dataset of 750recorded ECG segments published with the challenge, our method achieved 96% accurate false alarm detection in0.51 seconds on average over all segments.

Primary Faculty Mentor Name

Byung Lee

Status

Undergraduate

Student College

College of Engineering and Mathematical Sciences

Program/Major

Biomedical Engineering

Second Program/Major

Computer Science

Primary Research Category

Engineering & Physical Sciences

Secondary Research Category

Biological Sciences

Abstract only.

Share

COinS
 

Early Detection of True or False Cardiac Alarms in the ICU

Early detection of whether a cardiac alarm is true or false is as critical as accurate detection in intensive care. Delayed detection may lead to a patient’s death if the alarm is true or to disruption if false. There has been a body of research, as signified by the 2015 PhysioNet/CinC Challenge, and due accomplishments have been made in the relevant computational technology. The focus of the research, however, has been on the accuracy of false-alarm detection, and yet the highest accuracy known thus far is in the lower 80% range. Our work achieves much higher accuracy by utilizing state-of-the-art machine learning methods and, more importantly, achieves very early detection, almost at the onset of a cardiac alarm. This is enabled by the machine learning method used, which is a combination of ResNet and BiLSTM. Using the PhysioNet dataset of 750recorded ECG segments published with the challenge, our method achieved 96% accurate false alarm detection in0.51 seconds on average over all segments.