Presentation Title
The Legacy of Batson v. Kentucky: Race, Jury Selection, and Justice
Abstract
Batson v. Kentucky (1986) aimed to curb racial discrimination in jury selection for criminal trials by prohibiting the use of peremptory challenges for racial reasons. This paper argues that Batson has inefficiently addressed this problem. Racial discrimination still occurs in jury selection, which harms defendants, jurors, minority communities, and the judiciary itself. Batson did not do enough to mitigate this harm. In this paper, possible solutions to this problem are analyzed using a synthesis of previous work on this topic and original qualitative research. It is ultimately argued that the best solution would be to eliminate peremptory challenges altogether. The peremptory system is inherently at odds with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which justifies the abolition of this system. We risk the occurrence of injustices if we allow juries to be selected unfairly, and eliminating peremptories will make the system more fair, while also fixing the holes in Batson’s procedure.
Primary Faculty Mentor Name
Lisa Holmea
Status
Undergraduate
Student College
College of Arts and Sciences
Program/Major
Political Science
Primary Research Category
Social Sciences
Secondary Research Category
Arts & Humanities
The Legacy of Batson v. Kentucky: Race, Jury Selection, and Justice
Batson v. Kentucky (1986) aimed to curb racial discrimination in jury selection for criminal trials by prohibiting the use of peremptory challenges for racial reasons. This paper argues that Batson has inefficiently addressed this problem. Racial discrimination still occurs in jury selection, which harms defendants, jurors, minority communities, and the judiciary itself. Batson did not do enough to mitigate this harm. In this paper, possible solutions to this problem are analyzed using a synthesis of previous work on this topic and original qualitative research. It is ultimately argued that the best solution would be to eliminate peremptory challenges altogether. The peremptory system is inherently at odds with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which justifies the abolition of this system. We risk the occurrence of injustices if we allow juries to be selected unfairly, and eliminating peremptories will make the system more fair, while also fixing the holes in Batson’s procedure.